Yaron Sheffer writes: > Or else, we could remove the sentence "For example, it might > indicate the ability to process a newly defined notification > message."
That is example what changing minor number might mean. All current conforming implementations already know how to process our newly defined error notifications (they assume exchange failed), thus there is no need to update minor number, as there is no new ability needed for implementations to process those notifications. There is no reason to change that text. It does not require us to do something, it is just example. > I thinking bumping the minor version number would be > extremely risky. We know that everybody can ignore unknown > notifications. We don't know that everybody can deal correctly with > version number, simply because this has been tested less frequently. Agree on that. -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
