I would like to review further versions of this draft and be interested in contributing text.
regards, Min On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:18:59 +0200, Yaron Sheffer wrote: This draft proposes an extensibility framework for WESP, as well as several specific extensions. Proposed starting point: http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-montenegro-ipsecme-wesp-extensions-00.txt. Please reply to the list: - If this proposal is accepted as a WG work item, are you committing to review multiple versions of the draft? - Are you willing to contribute text to the draft? - Would you like to co-author it? Please also reply to the list if: - You believe this is NOT a reasonable activity for the WG to spend time on. If this is the case, please explain your position. Do not explore the fine technical details (which will change anyway, once the WG gets hold of the draft); instead explain why this is uninteresting for the WG or for the industry at large. Also, please mark the title clearly (e.g. "DES40-export in IPsec - NO!"). _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
