If this proposal is accepted, I commit to review it.

Scott Moonen (smoo...@us.ibm.com)
z/OS Communications Server TCP/IP Development
http://www.linkedin.com/in/smoonen



From:
Yaron Sheffer <yar...@checkpoint.com>
To:
"ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Date:
11/29/2009 12:26 PM
Subject:
[IPsec] Proposed work item: Labelled IPsec



This work item proposes to extend IKEv2 (and IKEv1) so as to allow IPsec 
to be used in environments that require Mandatory Access Control. It is 
envisioned that this will be used by modern high-security operating 
systems, that go beyond the currently supported Multilevel Security (MLS).

Proposed starting point: 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jml-ipsec-ikev2-security-context-01 and 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jml-ipsec-ikev1-security-context-01.
 
Please reply to the list:
 
- If this proposal is accepted as a WG work item, are you committing to 
review multiple versions of the draft?
- Are you willing to contribute text to the draft?
- Would you like to co-author it?
 
Please also reply to the list if:
 
- You believe this is NOT a reasonable activity for the WG to spend time 
on.
 
If this is the case, please explain your position. Do not explore the fine 
technical details (which will change anyway, once the WG gets hold of the 
draft); instead explain why this is uninteresting for the WG or for the 
industry at large. Also, please mark the title clearly (e.g. "DES40-export 
in IPsec - NO!").
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec


_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to