Hi Team, According to me, we need to support this draft as WG item as it appears to enhance the failure detection time. Currently, there are many scenarios, in which we detect and delete stale SA only by max. re-transmits. I would like to review this draft.
Regards, Raj 2009/11/29 Yaron Sheffer <yar...@checkpoint.com> > This work item proposes an IKEv2 extension to allow an IKE peer to quickly > and securely detect that its opposite peer has lost state. This is claimed > to be quicker than the current method, which is based on time outs. > > Proposed starting point: http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nir-ike-qcd-05.txtor > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-detienne-ikev2-recovery-03. > > Please reply to the list: > > - If this proposal is accepted as a WG work item, are you committing to > review multiple versions of the draft? > - Are you willing to contribute text to the draft? > - Would you like to co-author it? > > Please also reply to the list if: > > - You believe this is NOT a reasonable activity for the WG to spend time > on. > > If this is the case, please explain your position. Do not explore the fine > technical details (which will change anyway, once the WG gets hold of the > draft); instead explain why this is uninteresting for the WG or for the > industry at large. Also, please mark the title clearly (e.g. "DES40-export > in IPsec - NO!"). > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > IPsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec >
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
