Yaron Sheffer writes: > Can you live with: > > Implementations MUST support HTTP.
This is already in the RFC4306. > The behavior of other URL methods is not currently specified, so > such methods SHOULD NOT be used in the absence of a Standards Track > document defining them. This addition is ok for me, altough I do not think we need to have *Standard Track* documents to be able to use, I would just say "in the absens of document defining them". I think having information RFC telling how to use ftp URLs should be ok, especially as some people might be against making such document standard track document. -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
