On Nov 11, 2009, at 3:39 PM, Srinivasu S R S Dhulipala (srinid) wrote:
> 
>> 2) If not same, what purpose should each of the above identities serve
> 
>   1) mainly used as a hint for the gateway as to which AAA server to
> choose
>   2) It's the AAA server that may request the identity, and it's
> internal to AAA. It doesn't play in IKE
> 
> [SRINI] Does this imply that gateway SHOULD not send EAP identity
> request to the client,
>            we see that one 3rd party IKEv2 client is sending IP address
> as IDi, from which we can't
>            take any hints. Moreover, the same client is expecting an
> EAP-ID request to be sent,
>            else EAP is failing.
>            I've started another thread about why did we demote "SHOULD"
> to "should" if the gateway is
>            Not supposed to send EAP-identity request to the client. I
> think we should promote it back.

The gateway never sends any EAP identity requests at all. If such a request 
exists, it is sent by the AAA server. The gateway serves only as a pass-through.

For that reason, there is typically no reason for the gateway to inspect the 
contents of the EAP payload.


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to