Thanks Paul and agreed. - Ken
>-----Original Message----- >From: Paul Hoffman [mailto:paul.hoff...@vpnc.org] >Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:44 AM >To: Grewal, Ken; ipsec@ietf.org >Subject: Re: [IPsec] WESP #109 - WESP header alignment for IPv6 > >At 12:13 PM -0600 9/24/09, Grewal, Ken wrote: >>Proposed change >>0 1 2 3 >>0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 >>+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >>| Next Header | HdrLen | TrailerLen |V|V|E|X| Rsvd | >>+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >>| Reserved (zeros) for IPv6 alignment | >>+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > >No hat: > >I agree with the idea, but I would word it a bit differently. It's not >"reserved", it is actually used. "IPv6Padding (4 octets)" might make it >clearer. > >--Paul Hoffman, Director >--VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
