On Sep 4, 2009, at 5:53 PM, David Wierbowski wrote:
>Yes, I will soften the language a bit, but I won't mention a DELETE payload. >If some implementations do it. >others may come to expect it. We don't want to encourage that by suggesting >that it's a good idea. Yoav, Why is it a a bad idea to include a DELETE payload in this case? Because the IKE SA was not really created, so there is no IKE SA to delete. It's a bad idea because it is superfluous, and we don't want to risk anyone relying on this.
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
