At 7:36 PM +0300 7/1/09, Yaron Sheffer wrote: >I'd like to propose: > > 1. Introduction > 1.1. Usage Scenarios > 1.1.1. Security Gateway to Security Gateway Tunnel Mode > 1.1.2. Endpoint-to-Endpoint Transport Mode > 1.1.3. Endpoint to Security Gateway Tunnel Mode > 1.1.4. Other Scenarios > 1.2. Requirements Terminology > > 2. IKE Protocol Overview (or "Essentials") [today's Sec. 1.2-1.5] > 2.1. The Initial Exchanges > 2.2. The CREATE_CHILD_SA Exchange > 2.2.1. Creating New Child SAs with the CREATE_CHILD_SA > Exchange > 2.2.2. Rekeying IKE SAs with the CREATE_CHILD_SA Exchange > 2.2.3. Rekeying Child SAs with the CREATE_CHILD_SA > Exchange > 2.3. The INFORMATIONAL Exchange > 2.3.1. Deleting an SA with INFORMATIONAL Exchanges > 2.4. Informational Messages outside of an IKE SA > > 3. IKE Protocol Details and Variations [today's Sec. 2] > > Appendix X: Differences Between RFC 4306 and This Document [today's Sec. >1.7]
A different idea is to simply rename Section 1 "IKE Protocol Overview", and move the requirements terminology (which is, in essence, boilerplate that most people ignore anyway) and the differences to appendixes. >Do you see value in this, or do you prefer keeping the existing order? I see only minor value to the original proposal, and a high cost to me (the editor). I think my alternate proposal isn't so onerous, but am happy to follow Yaron's proposal if people really like it. --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
