Hi Yoav,

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Raj Singh <rsjen...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Yoav,
>
> Please find my inputs:
>
> 1. In section 3:
>
> .....
>
>    A supporting responder that advertised the VID payload in the
>    IKE_INIT response MUST process a modified IKE_AUTH request, and MUST
>
>    reply with a modified IKE_AUTH response.  Such a responder MUST NOT
>    reply with a modified IKE_AUTH response if the initiator did not send
>    a modified IKE_AUTH request.
>    A supporting responder that has been configured not to support this
>
>    extension to the protocol MUST behave as the same as if it didn't
>    support this extension.  It MUST NOT advertise the capability with a
>    VID payload, and it SHOULD reply with an INVALID_SYNTAX Notify
>    payload if the client sends an IKE_AUTH request that is modified as
>
>    described in Section 5.
>
>
> ....
>
> It does not fully clarifies exactly the behavior of the responder if a
> faulty initiator send modified IKE_AUTH request without responder sending 
> NO_CHILD
> in IKE_SA_INIT response ? Shall in that case responder should bring UP the 
> only IKE SA
>
> and send modified response or send INVALID_SYNTAX notify and tear down the 
> SA? More
> clarity needed here. Also we can replace SHOULD to MUST for INVALID_SYNTAX.
>
> 2. In whole document, IKE_SA_INIT exchange has been termed as IKE_INIT,
> change it to IKE_SA_INIT.
>
> 3. In section 4, hash string "Can do IKE_AUTH without child SA payloads
> also" seems to more close to what draft says :-)

Also please make a mention of hashing algorithm for completeness.

>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Raj
>

With Regards,
Raj

>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Yoav Nir <y...@checkpoint.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> version -02 of this private submission draft, with two additional
>> co-authors and some more use cases.
>>
>> Enjoy
>>
>> Yoav
>> ________________________________________
>> From: i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org [i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org [internet-dra...@ietf.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 00:00
>> To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
>> Subject: I-D Action:draft-nir-ike-nochild-02.txt
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>>
>>        Title           : A Childless Initiation of the IKE SA
>>        Author(s)       : Y. Nir, et al.
>>        Filename        : draft-nir-ike-nochild-02.txt
>>        Pages           : 7
>>        Date            : 2009-06-17
>>
>> This document describes an extension to the IKEv2 protocol that
>> allows an IKE SA to be created and authenticated without generating a
>> child SA.
>>
>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nir-ike-nochild-02.txt
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>
>> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
>> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
>> Internet-Draft.
>>
>>
>>
>> Email secured by Check Point
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IPsec mailing list
>> IPsec@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to