Paul Hoffman writes: > RFC 4306 says: > Although new payload types may be added in the future and may appear > interleaved with the fields defined in this specification, > implementations MUST send the payloads defined in this specification > in the order shown in the figures in section 2 and implementations > SHOULD reject as invalid a message with those payloads in any other > order. > > a) Downgrade the MUST to a SHOULD without other changes.
I think that should be fine, but I think more important would be to change "SHOULD reject" to "SHOULD NOT reject" or even "MUST NOT reject". As I do not think anybody currently follows this SHOULD I think that should not make any current real implementations incompatible with new versions. -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
