At 12:48 PM -0800 1/25/09, Paul Hoffman wrote: >Yes, definitely. At this point, we have heard from two groups of authors; >hearing from the wider implementers community would be valuable.
We still have not heard from many. During the interim meeting, a good question was raised: are we making this decision based on implementation desires vs. protocol cleanliness vs. deployment ability. We don't have enough input at this point to pick between those. So, let me get this thread going again. If you have an opinion about the core issue of how session resumption is done (extend the IKE_SA_INIT or create a new exchange type), please state it again and say what draws you to this conclusion. This is *not* a vote: it is a request to get the discussion going with some hopefully better metrics. --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
