On Tue, Aug 14, 2018, 2:59 AM Ondrej Tomcik <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Gregg, > Hello Ondrej, ... > Doesn't your design places a new burden on servers? > > Burden? There is no burden with observe. You have still one TCP connection, > That's a burden. TCP support is not an OCF requirement. > , so each change to resource which is observed is published to the cloud > (observer) > That's a burden. Observation support is not an OCF requirement afaik. All of that stuff takes space, time, and energy. It's a design that effectively excludes highly constrained nodes. Works for some scenarios, not for others. That's why we need a clear exposition of exactly what problems OCF cloud is trying to address. "Remote access" is way too broad, imho. Gregg > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#9861): https://lists.iotivity.org/g/iotivity-dev/message/9861 Mute This Topic: https://lists.iotivity.org/mt/24238274/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.iotivity.org/g/iotivity-dev/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
