We need to be doing much more regular sweeps through the iotivity jira issues. I'd love to see a regular triage session, and some kind of session tracking progress, but I realize these are hard with timezones and other job responsibilities for people.
I note that OSWG (from recent minutes - which had no detail) has some kind of plan evolving for topic owners to look through bugs, I'll be interested to how this plays out. Meanwhile, Jira has facilities that could be used - one trick would be to create a project board and move tickets which represent important work, but which are not resourced, to that board. That depends on bugs being triaged promptly, though (see first line) On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Christian Gran <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > hmmm, I would just put the ticket into “unassigned" state. > But this would mean that from time to time we need to check all tickets in > that state - as nobody will work on these or see these. > > If we do not want to use the ‘unassigned’ state - using a tag is probably > a good option. > > thanks > Christian > > > > On 3. Apr 2018, at 16:50, Heldt-Sheller, Nathan < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Sorry, I mistakenly re-used previous subject… please reply to this message > for comments on this topic. > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected] > <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Heldt-Sheller, > Nathan > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 3, 2018 7:49 AM > *To:* Christian Gran <[email protected]>; [email protected] > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [dev] New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and > IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai > > Christian (and others who may have suggestions), > > On the ATG call today a question came up about how to flag JIRA tickets as > “needing developer resource”. The example in this case is the Core Privacy > CR which has a JIRA ticket but no implementation owner. We felt it would > be a useful thing if we could run a query at the TSC level that would bring > up all features needing implementation owners. > > My first though was a simple tag “NEEDS_DEVELOPER_RESOURCE” or similar, > but first, do you know if there’s an existing JIRA BKM for this kind of > thing? Tags are great, but they have a way of not being used consistently, > especially at a high level that spans multiple components. > > Thanks, > Nathan > > > > _______________________________________________ > iotivity-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev > >
_______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
