Hi Gregg,
There are also a lot of auto-generated appendices that form a large part of the document. Sometimes the appendices have all of the auto-generated sections, including the Swagger definitions, and sometimes they do not. I suggest that you not look at the total length of the document. If you look to see how many pages make up the meat of the document prior to the appendices, they should be pretty close. As Jin said, OCF 1.0 is not certifiable; these versions were used the kick off the ISO process. There are known spec bugs in them that were fixed in OCF 1.3. Mitch From: 최진혁 [mailto:jinc...@samsung.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 10:48 PM To: Gregg Reynolds; JinHyeock Choi Cc: iotivity-dev; Mitch Kettrick Subject: RE: Re: [dev] ocf specs? Gregg You can find the change history in https://workspace.openconnectivity.org/apps/org/workgroup/architecture_tg/document.php?document_id=10901 along with intermediate versions. Among them, the main changes are v0.3r06: Includes the following BZ integrated for review: - BZ #1889 [Batch Interface Clarification ] - Updated - BZ #1890 [Query behaviour clarity - multiple parameter support] v0.3r03: This is a 0.3 version of the specification. It additionally includes the following BZ (CRs) integrated for review: - BZ #1626 [Overview of CoAP Native Cloud] - BZ #1795 [KeepAlive Mechanism in OCF 1.0 needs to be clarified to support/enable certification] - BZ #1866 [RD update for Amsterdam] Also some editorial polishing in https://workspace.openconnectivity.org/apps/org/workgroup/architecture_tg/document.php?document_id=11016 best regards JinHyeock --------- Original Message --------- Sender : Gregg Reynolds <d...@mobileink.com> Date : 2017-08-30 11:01 (GMT+9) Title : Re: [dev] ocf specs? On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:33 PM, JinHyeock Choi <jinc...@gmail.com> wrote: + Mitch Kettrick (CPM) OCF 1.3. The difference between OCF 1.0 & 1.3 are mostly about clarification with a few additional features (e.g. Easy Setup) & the CERT would be based on OCF 1.3 I ask Mitch, CPM, to correct if I misunderstand. Thanks. Here's what worries me a bit: OCF 1.0.0 Core: 275 pages OCF_Core_Specification_IPR_Candidate_v1.3.0: 294 pages OCF_Security_Specification_v1.0.0: 203 pages OCF_Security_Specification_IPR_Candidate_v1.3.0: 188 pages That seems like some pretty big changes. Is there a list somewhere? Thanks again, Gregg JinHyeock p.s. Taking 2 month IPR review period into consideration, the change is the 4, 5 month's work. On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Gregg Reynolds <d...@mobileink.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Gregg Reynolds <d...@mobileink.com> wrote: >> >> OCF 1.0.0 was released on June 27, 2017. >> >> On August 18 2017 - not even 1 month later - a draft for OCF 1.3 was >> released. >> > Ok, not even 2 months later. ;) > >> >> Which one should I read? Which one does Iotivity plan to support, and >> when? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Gregg > > > > _______________________________________________ > iotivity-dev mailing list > iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org > https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev > _______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev <http://ext.samsung.net/mail/ext/v1/external/status/update?userid=jinchoe&do=bWFpbElEPTIwMTcwODMwMDU0NzQ0ZXBjbXMxcDNmY2MxYWU0YjdkMGEyMDJlNTQ0YmVlOTM1M2FiZmE3NiZyZWNpcGllbnRBZGRyZXNzPWNwbUBvcGVuY29ubmVjdGl2aXR5Lm9yZw__> --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com
_______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
