On Friday, 18 August 2017 13:22:18 PDT Gregg Reynolds wrote: > iotivity, the project, or iotivity, the ocf implementation?
I meant the code that the IoTivity Project releases as "IoTivity". That happens to be OCF's reference implementation. > my 2 cents: the project is an appropriate home for vendor-contributed > "add-ons", but the iotivity core/kernel implementation is not. Ideally, but maybe it's not feasible for all extensions. And as IoTivity Project, we want to cope with vendor extensions that may exist out there anyway, so we may want to accept them in our core files. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
