On 01/17/2017 08:26 AM, Mats Wichmann wrote: > On 01/17/2017 09:19 AM, Philippe Coval wrote: >> Hi Mats > >>> If those are all classed as maintenance that's >>> fine, but it's still been a little unexpected to see so much traffic >>> after the release. > >> It would be nice to release a 1.2.2 too. > > I think that's what I was leading to, without ever getting to saying so: > if there have been many changes to 1.2.1, it's hard for people basing > their product work on 1.2.1 to keep track. Seems like we ought to be > planning on 1.2.2 to roll up the changes, so there's a clean release. I > know doing another release is a pain and consumes a fair bit of work, > but how else to be reliably confident the changes get in the hands of > the people using 1.2 branch?
Is there not going to be a 1.2.2? I had assumed there was. ? thanks, Nivedita
