Beyond OCF communication, there could be options in the other world. I'm afraid taking only secure connection in other world which is out of control, makes iotivity half-cooked. -----Original Message----- From: Thiago Macieira [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 3:50 PM To: ???(Uze Choi) Cc: ashok.channa at samsung.com; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: Re: [dev] CoAP - HTTP Proxy Review Request
On sexta-feira, 29 de julho de 2016 15:45:58 PDT ???(Uze Choi) wrote: > You looks a little bit confused with IoTivity scope. > Beyond the OCF protocol path, we cannot handle everything. > Let's think about the UPnP bridge, are we handling the UPnP secure > channel from first? That's a good question, I can check with Rick what the status is. I don't even know if UPnP even has a secure channel, though. But if it exists and is used in devices, it should be implemented. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
