Then, I think this is not mandatory, because this path is out of the OCF security scope.
BR, Uze Choi -----Original Message----- From: Thiago Macieira [mailto:thiago.macie...@intel.com] Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 12:05 AM To: ???(Uze Choi) Cc: ashok.channa at samsung.com; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: Re: [dev] CoAP - HTTP Proxy Review Request On quarta-feira, 27 de julho de 2016 17:08:26 PDT ???(Uze Choi) wrote: > Regarding second argue point, do you mean HTTP communication in > ThinDevice--G/W or G/W--WebServer? If G/W--WebServer, HTTPS part is > not strictly required. Otherwise, channel only requires coap security. > I cannot understand what is the discussion point. I meant GW-Webserver and I do mean that HTTPS is required. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
