On Tuesday 24 February 2015 21:39:13 ??? wrote: > Thiago, > > I mean that this issue can't be resolved by Pat only. > And, it isn't efficient that you collect all maintainer's opinion. > I think that Uze and Pat can discuss F2F firstly because they all join > current F2F meeting. So, I mentioned as belows because I need to hear from > several maintainers, firstly.
Fair enough. We'll await the conclusion. > And, one more thing. > Currently, resource related source codes are maintained by Pat and Uze. > I think It isn't good to maintain. So, we need to resolve that. > I've shared proposal after discussing with Deputy Lead Architect (Mats). > You can freely give your opinion to us, and you can wait for maintainer's > opinion about library. We will decide after collection several opinions. You're talking about splitting the responsibilities, which is orthogonal to the library organisation, but does affect the source code organisation. Anyway, why do you say that the shared responsibility is not good to maintain? What problems do you suspect will happen? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
