Sounds good, let me know if you run into any issue!

I have generated a new Edison image with the iotivity stuff in it yesterday, is 
there any simple sanity test I can run to confirm that the iotivity binaries 
are functional?

Cheers,
Geoffroy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maloor, Kishen
> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 8:45 PM
> To: VanCutsem, Geoffroy; Lankswert, Patrick; Prasad, Sudarshan; iotivity-
> dev at lists.iotivity.org; Keany, Bernie
> Subject: Re: [dev] Bug in the iotivity_0.9.0.bb recipe (meta-oic)
> 
> Geoffroy,
> 
> 
> That is something I didn't know you could do - pretty cool :)
> I will test this out and update the recipe upstream.
> 
> Thank You!
> -Kishen.
> 
> On 2/9/15, 11:02 AM, "VanCutsem, Geoffroy"
> <geoffroy.vancutsem at intel.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >Hi Kishen,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Maloor, Kishen
> >> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 7:18 PM
> >> To: Lankswert, Patrick; VanCutsem, Geoffroy; Prasad, Sudarshan;
> >>iotivity-
> >> dev at lists.iotivity.org; Keany, Bernie
> >> Subject: Re: [dev] Bug in the iotivity_0.9.0.bb recipe (meta-oic)
> >>
> >> Geoffroy,
> >>
> >> The Iotivity recipe uses Yocto?s scons class and requires that
> >> scons be present in your Yocto build sysroot.
> >> The Yocto project comes with two recipes (python-scons and
> >> python-scons-native) which set this up for you.
> >> Unfortunately, this wasn?t a documented fact by the Yocto
> >> Project but I had figured it out with some exploration and separately
> >>ran
> >> ?bitbake python-scons? and ?bitbake python-scons-native? to bring in
> >>scons.
> >I did not have to do that as soon as I fixed the location of your
> >'inherit scons' statement in the recipe.
> >
> >>
> >> It slipped my mind when I prepared the README, and one or more
> >> people who have successfully built Iotivity on Yocto seemed to know
> >> what to do. So, thanks for pointing this out.
> >>
> >> I?d rather we not rely on scons from the host OS and instead continue to
> >> use Yocto?s scons build for consistency sake.
> >You're not using the host OS scons as soon as the 'inherit scons'
> >statement is in the right place in the recipe. Yocto will build it for
> >you and put it in your sysroot.
> >
> >>
> >> In the meanwhile, I will either update the README or set
> >> the two scons recipes as build time dependencies.
> >No need for that, the scons class exists and is functional, you just need
> >to move the 'inherit scons' statement further down the recipe so it is
> >correctly picked up by bitbake. This is what my patch below does.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Geoffroy
> >
> >diff --git a/recipes-core/iotivity/iotivity_0.9.0.bb
> >b/recipes-core/iotivity/iotivity_0.9.0.bb
> >index 14bc6ad..0a0e3bc 100644
> >--- a/recipes-core/iotivity/iotivity_0.9.0.bb
> >+++ b/recipes-core/iotivity/iotivity_0.9.0.bb
> >@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
> >-inherit scons
> >-
> >SUMMARY = "Iotivity framework and SDK by the Open Interconnect
> >Consortium."
> >DESCRIPTION = "IoTivity is an open source software framework enabling
> >seamless device-to-device connectivi
> >HOMEPAGE = "https://www.iotivity.org/";
> >@@ -16,6 +14,8 @@ SRC_URI[cereal.md5sum] =
> >"2d9adeb49a2cb54f259c601d34d2d959"
> >SRC_URI[cereal.sha256sum] =
> >"33dfeed8f6345a4dff42e1057a79b1d5303624a4a3bdb362f9c17a0048c811
> ee"
> >SRCREV_cereal = "7121e91e6ab8c3e6a6516d9d9c3e6804e6f65245"
> >
> >+inherit scons
> >+
> >python () {
> >     EXTRA_OESCONS = ""
> >     IOTIVITY_TARGET_ARCH = d.getVar("TARGET_ARCH", True)
> >
> >
> >-----------------------------------------------
> >Intel Corporation NV/SA
> >Kings Square, Veldkant 31
> >2550 Kontich
> >RPM (Bruxelles) 0415.497.718.
> >Citibank, Brussels, account 570/1031255/09
> >
-----------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation NV/SA
Kings Square, Veldkant 31
2550 Kontich
RPM (Bruxelles) 0415.497.718. 
Citibank, Brussels, account 570/1031255/09

Reply via email to