On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 02:50:36PM -0400, Eric Farman wrote:
> I got a heads up from Matt about the s390 KVM vfio- variants failing on
> linux-next.
>
> For vfio-ap and vfio-ccw, they fail on the above error. Both calls to
> __iommu_domain_alloc fail because while dev->dev->bus is non-NULL (it
> points to the mdev bus_type registered in mdev_init()), the bus-
> >iommu_ops pointer is NULL. Which makes sense; the iommu_group is vfio-
> noiommu, via vfio_register_emulated_iommu_dev(), and mdev didn't
> establish an iommu_ops for its bus.
Oh, I think this is a VFIO problem, the iommu layer should not have to
deal with these fake non-iommu groups.
>From 9884850a5ceac957e6715beab0888294d4088877 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jason Gunthorpe <j...@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 16:03:34 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] vfio: Do not manipulate iommu dma_owner for fake iommu groups
Since asserting dma ownership now causes the group to have its DMA blocked
the iommu layer requires a working iommu. This means the dma_owner APIs
cannot be used on the fake groups that VFIO creates. Test for this and
avoid calling them.
Otherwise asserting dma ownership will fail for VFIO mdev devices as a
BLOCKING iommu_domain cannot be allocated due to the NULL iommu ops.
Fixes: 0286300e6045 ("iommu: iommu_group_claim_dma_owner() must always assign a
domain")
Reported-by: Eric Farman <far...@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <j...@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
I think this will have to go through Alex's tree due to all the other rework
in this area.
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
index cfcff7764403fc..f5ed03897210c3 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
@@ -927,7 +927,8 @@ static void __vfio_group_unset_container(struct vfio_group
*group)
driver->ops->detach_group(container->iommu_data,
group->iommu_group);
- iommu_group_release_dma_owner(group->iommu_group);
+ if (group->type == VFIO_IOMMU)
+ iommu_group_release_dma_owner(group->iommu_group);
group->container = NULL;
group->container_users = 0;
@@ -1001,9 +1002,11 @@ static int vfio_group_set_container(struct vfio_group
*group, int container_fd)
goto unlock_out;
}
- ret = iommu_group_claim_dma_owner(group->iommu_group, f.file);
- if (ret)
- goto unlock_out;
+ if (group->type == VFIO_IOMMU) {
+ ret = iommu_group_claim_dma_owner(group->iommu_group, f.file);
+ if (ret)
+ goto unlock_out;
+ }
driver = container->iommu_driver;
if (driver) {
@@ -1011,7 +1014,9 @@ static int vfio_group_set_container(struct vfio_group
*group, int container_fd)
group->iommu_group,
group->type);
if (ret) {
- iommu_group_release_dma_owner(group->iommu_group);
+ if (group->type == VFIO_IOMMU)
+ iommu_group_release_dma_owner(
+ group->iommu_group);
goto unlock_out;
}
}
--
2.36.0
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
