On 2022/5/17 16:21, John Garry wrote:
> On 17/05/2022 09:09, Yicong Yang wrote:
>>>> +    target = 
>>>> cpumask_any(cpumask_of_node(dev_to_node(&hisi_ptt->pdev->dev)));
>>>> +    if (target < nr_cpumask_bits) {
>>> the comment for cpumask_any() hints to check against nr_cpu_ids - any 
>>> specific reason to check against nr_cpumask_bits?
>>>
>> here should be:
>>     if (target >= nr_cpumask_bits) {
>>
>> will fix this up.
>>
> 
> I am still not sure that using nr_cpumask_bits is correct.

Let's use nr_cpu_ids to match the comment of cpumask_any(). Actually we should 
have
nr_cpu_ids(possible cpus, init to NR_CPUS) <= nr_cpumask_bits (NR_CPUS) so it's 
ok here.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to