On 2022-04-29 17:40, Joao Martins wrote:
On 4/29/22 17:11, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 03:45:23PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
On 4/29/22 13:23, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 01:06:06PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
TBH I'd be inclined to just enable DBM unconditionally in
arm_smmu_domain_finalise() if the SMMU supports it. Trying to toggle it
dynamically (especially on a live domain) seems more trouble that it's
worth.
Hmmm, but then it would strip userland/VMM from any sort of control (contrary
to what we can do on the CPU/KVM side). e.g. the first time you do
GET_DIRTY_IOVA it would return all dirtied IOVAs since the beginning
of guest time, as opposed to those only after you enabled dirty-tracking.
It just means that on SMMU the start tracking op clears all the dirty
bits.
Hmm, OK. But aren't really picking a poison here? On ARM it's the difference
from switching the setting the DBM bit and put the IOPTE as writeable-clean
(which
is clearing another bit) versus read-and-clear-when-dirty-track-start which
means
we need to re-walk the pagetables to clear one bit.
Yes, I don't think a iopte walk is avoidable?
Correct -- exactly why I am still more learning towards enable DBM bit only at
start
versus enabling DBM at domain-creation while clearing dirty at start.
I'd say it's largely down to whether you want the bother of
communicating a dynamic behaviour change into io-pgtable. The big
advantage of having it just use DBM all the time is that you don't have
to do that, and the "start tracking" operation is then nothing more than
a normal "read and clear" operation but ignoring the read result.
At this point I'd much rather opt for simplicity, and leave the fancier
stuff to revisit later if and when somebody does demonstrate a
significant overhead from using DBM when not strictly needed.
Thanks,
Robin.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
