On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 4:37 PM Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
> For the record, I believe that the partial revert proposed here
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg222300.html
> would have been a wiser choice, than a complete revert of commit
> aa6f8dcbab47 ("swiotlb: rework "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE"").
Yeah, the revert is basically my standard "this doesn't work,
discussion is still ongoing" thing.
I agree that the revert then brought back that DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC
complexity.
So that part of commit aa6f8dcbab47 was probably all good.
I somehow missed that Oleksandr had a tested-by for that smaller change too.
Linus
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
