On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 19:16:14 -0800, Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Fenghua, > > On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 15:02:48 -0800, Fenghua Yu <fenghua...@intel.com> > wrote: > > > @@ -1047,8 +1040,6 @@ struct iommu_sva *intel_svm_bind(struct device > > *dev, struct mm_struct *mm, void } > > > > sva = intel_svm_bind_mm(iommu, dev, mm, flags); > > - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sva)) > > - intel_svm_free_pasid(mm); > If bind fails, the PASID has no IOMMU nor CPU context. It should be safe > to free here. > Actually, here we cannot tell if the bind is the first of the mm so I think this is fine. Reviewed-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com> > Thanks, > > Jacob Thanks, Jacob _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
