On 2021/12/14 22:48, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 02:32:48PM +0800, Zhou Wang wrote: >> The commit f115f3c0d5d8 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Decrease the queue size of >> evtq and priq") decreases evtq and priq, which may lead evtq/priq to be >> full with fault events, e.g HiSilicon ZIP/SEC/HPRE have maximum 1024 queues >> in one device, every queue could be binded with one process and trigger a >> fault event. So let's revert f115f3c0d5d8. >> >> In fact, if an implementation of SMMU really does not need so long evtq >> and priq, value of IDR1_EVTQS and IDR1_PRIQS can be set to proper ones. >> >> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzh...@hisilicon.com> >> --- >> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h | 5 ++--- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > I'd like an Ack from Zhen Lei on this, as the aim of the original patch > was to reduce memory consumption. I did it for the purpose of saving memory. At the time, I didn't think it would have accumulated so many events. Now there is such a practical situation. Ensuring functionality stability is more important than saving a little memory. So I have no objection to reverting my patch. Acked-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leiz...@huawei.com> > > Will > . > _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
Re: [PATCH] Revert "iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Decrease the queue size of evtq and priq"
Leizhen (ThunderTown) via iommu Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:59:28 -0800
- [PATCH] Revert "iommu/arm-smmu-v3: De... Zhou Wang via iommu
- Re: [PATCH] Revert "iommu/arm-sm... Will Deacon
- Re: [PATCH] Revert "iommu/ar... Robin Murphy
- Re: [PATCH] Revert "iommu/ar... Leizhen (ThunderTown) via iommu
- Re: [PATCH] Revert "iommu/arm-sm... Will Deacon