On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 11:42:43AM +0900, David Stevens wrote:
> From: David Stevens <[email protected]>
> 
> The is_swiotlb_buffer function takes the physical address of the swiotlb
> buffer, not the physical address of the original buffer. The sglist
> contains the physical addresses of the original buffer, so for the
> sync_sg functions to work properly when a bounce buffer might have been
> used, we need to use iommu_iova_to_phys to look up the physical address.
> This is what sync_single does, so call that function on each sglist
> segment.
> 
> The previous code mostly worked because swiotlb does the transfer on map
> and unmap. However, any callers which use DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC with
> sglists or which call sync_sg would not have had anything copied to the
> bounce buffer.
> 
> Fixes: 82612d66d51d ("iommu: Allow the dma-iommu api to use bounce buffers")
> Signed-off-by: David Stevens <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> index 98ba927aee1a..54e103b989d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> @@ -813,14 +813,13 @@ static void iommu_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device 
> *dev,
>       if (dev_is_dma_coherent(dev) && !dev_is_untrusted(dev))
>               return;
>  
> +     if (dev_is_untrusted(dev))
> +             for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nelems, i)
> +                     iommu_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, sg_dma_address(sg),
> +                                                   sg->length, dir);
> +     else
> +             for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nelems, i)
>                       arch_sync_dma_for_cpu(sg_phys(sg), sg->length, dir);
>  }

I'd remove the above check and fold the if (!dev_is_dma_coherent(dev))
into the else line.  Same for iommu_dma_sync_sg_for_device.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to