On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 10:30 PM Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 12:34:59PM +0900, David Stevens wrote:
> > From: David Stevens <steve...@chromium.org>
> >
> > The is_swiotlb_buffer function takes the physical address of the swiotlb
> > buffer, not the physical address of the original buffer. The sglist
> > contains the physical addresses of the original buffer, so for the
> > sync_sg functions to work properly when a bounce buffer might have been
> > used, we need to use iommu_iova_to_phys to look up the physical address.
> > This is what sync_single does, so call that function on each sglist
> > segment.
> >
> > The previous code mostly worked because swiotlb does the transfer on map
> > and unmap. However, any callers which use DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC with
> > sglists or which call sync_sg would not have had anything copied to the
> > bounce buffer.
> >
> > Fixes: 82612d66d51d ("iommu: Allow the dma-iommu api to use bounce buffers")
> > Signed-off-by: David Stevens <steve...@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> > index 7bcdd1205535..eac65302439e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> > @@ -811,14 +811,14 @@ static void iommu_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device
> > *dev,
> > if (dev_is_dma_coherent(dev) && !dev_is_untrusted(dev))
> > return;
> >
> > - for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nelems, i) {
> > - if (!dev_is_dma_coherent(dev))
> > - arch_sync_dma_for_cpu(sg_phys(sg), sg->length, dir);
> > -
> > - if (is_swiotlb_buffer(sg_phys(sg)))
> > + if (dev_is_untrusted(dev))
> > + for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nelems, i)
> > + iommu_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, sg_dma_address(sg),
> > + sg->length, dir);
> > + else
> > + for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nelems, i)
> > swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, sg_phys(sg),
> > sg->length, dir);
>
> Doesn't this skip arch_sync_dma_for_cpu() for non-coherent trusted devices?
Whoops, this was supposed to be a call to arch_sync_dma_for_cpu, not
to swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu. Similar to the sync_sg_for_device
case.
> Why not skip the extra dev_is_untrusted(dev) call here and just call
> iommu_dma_sync_single_for_cpu() for each entry regardless?
iommu_dma_sync_single_for_cpu calls iommu_iova_to_phys to translate
the dma_addr_t to a phys_addr_t. Since the physical address is readily
available, I think it's better to avoid that extra work.
> Will
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
