On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 08:13:07PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > On 3/24/2021 1:42 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 06:53:49PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >> When SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE is used, there should really be no allocations of > >> default_nslabs to occur since we are not going to use those slabs. If a > >> platform was somehow setting swiotlb_no_force and a later call to > >> swiotlb_init() was to be made we would still be proceeding with > >> allocating the default SWIOTLB size (64MB), whereas if swiotlb=noforce > >> was set on the kernel command line we would have only allocated 2KB. > >> > >> This would be inconsistent and the point of initializing default_nslabs > >> to 1, was intended to allocate the minimum amount of memory possible, so > >> simply remove that minimal allocation period. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com> > > > > Looks good, > > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> > > > > Thanks! Konrad, can you apply this patch to your for-linus-5.13 branch > if you are also happy with it?
It should be now visible? > -- > Florian _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
