On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:06:42AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > It's not inconceivable to have a control queue doing DMA tagged with > PASID. The devices I know either use untagged DMA, or have a choice to use > a PASID.
I don't think we should encourage that. A PASID and all the related is so expensive compared to just doing normal untagged kernel DMA. I assume HW has these features because virtualization use cases might use them, eg by using mdev to assign a command queue - then it would need be be contained by a PASID. Jason _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
