On systems with at least 32 MiB, but less than 32 GiB of RAM, the DMA
memory pools are much larger than intended (e.g. 2 MiB instead of 128
KiB on a 256 MiB system).

Fix this by correcting the calculation of the number of GiBs of RAM in
the system.  Invert the order of the min/max operations, to keep on
calculating in pages until the last step, which aids readability.

Fixes: 1d659236fb43c4d2 ("dma-pool: scale the default DMA coherent pool size 
with memory capacity")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org>
---
v2:
  - Improve readability:
      - Divide by (SZ_1G / SZ_128K) instead of using a shift,
      - Invert min/max order to keep calculating in pages until the last
        step.
---
 kernel/dma/pool.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/dma/pool.c b/kernel/dma/pool.c
index 35bb51c31fff370f..8cfa01243ed27b6f 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/pool.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/pool.c
@@ -175,10 +175,9 @@ static int __init dma_atomic_pool_init(void)
         * sizes to 128KB per 1GB of memory, min 128KB, max MAX_ORDER-1.
         */
        if (!atomic_pool_size) {
-               atomic_pool_size = max(totalram_pages() >> PAGE_SHIFT, 1UL) *
-                                       SZ_128K;
-               atomic_pool_size = min_t(size_t, atomic_pool_size,
-                                        1 << (PAGE_SHIFT + MAX_ORDER-1));
+               unsigned long pages = totalram_pages() / (SZ_1G / SZ_128K);
+               pages = min_t(unsigned long, pages, MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES);
+               atomic_pool_size = max_t(size_t, pages << PAGE_SHIFT, SZ_128K);
        }
        INIT_WORK(&atomic_pool_work, atomic_pool_work_fn);
 
-- 
2.17.1

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to