Hi Jean,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2020 5:53 AM
> To: Bharat Bhushan <bbhush...@marvell.com>
> Cc: jean-phili...@linaro.org; j...@8bytes.org; jasow...@redhat.com;
> virtualizat...@lists.linux-foundation.org; iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org;
> linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; eric.auger....@gmail.com; eric.au...@redhat.com
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5] iommu/virtio: Use page size bitmap supported by
> endpoint
> 
> External Email
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 03:00:04PM +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> > Different endpoint can support different page size, probe endpoint if
> > it supports specific page size otherwise use global page sizes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bbhush...@marvell.com>
> > ---
> > v4->v5:
> >  - Rebase to Linux v5.7-rc4
> >
> > v3->v4:
> >  - Fix whitespace error
> >
> > v2->v3:
> >  - Fixed error return for incompatible endpoint
> >  - __u64 changed to __le64 in header file
> >
> >  drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c      | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h |  7 +++++
> >  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> > b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c index d5cac4f46ca5..9513d2ab819e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> > @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct viommu_endpoint {
> >     struct viommu_dev               *viommu;
> >     struct viommu_domain            *vdomain;
> >     struct list_head                resv_regions;
> > +   u64                             pgsize_bitmap;
> >  };
> >
> >  struct viommu_request {
> > @@ -415,6 +416,19 @@ static int viommu_replay_mappings(struct
> viommu_domain *vdomain)
> >     return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int viommu_set_pgsize_bitmap(struct viommu_endpoint *vdev,
> > +                               struct virtio_iommu_probe_pgsize_mask *mask,
> > +                               size_t len)
> > +{
> > +   u64 pgsize_bitmap = le64_to_cpu(mask->pgsize_bitmap);
> > +
> > +   if (len < sizeof(*mask))
> 
> This is too late to validate length, you have dereferenced it already.
> do it before the read pls.
> 
> > +           return -EINVAL;
> 
> OK but note that guest will then just proceed to ignore the property. Is that 
> really
> OK? Wouldn't host want to know?
> 
> 
> > +
> > +   vdev->pgsize_bitmap = pgsize_bitmap;
> 
> what if bitmap is 0? Is that a valid size? I see a bunch of BUG_ON with that 
> value ...
> 
> I also see a bunch of code like e.g. this:
> 
>         pg_size = 1UL << __ffs(pgsize_bitmap);
> 
> which probably won't DTRT on a 32 bit guest if the bitmap has bits set in the 
> high
> word.
> 
> 
> 
> > +   return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int viommu_add_resv_mem(struct viommu_endpoint *vdev,
> >                            struct virtio_iommu_probe_resv_mem *mem,
> >                            size_t len)
> > @@ -499,6 +513,9 @@ static int viommu_probe_endpoint(struct viommu_dev
> *viommu, struct device *dev)
> >             case VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_RESV_MEM:
> >                     ret = viommu_add_resv_mem(vdev, (void *)prop, len);
> >                     break;
> > +           case VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_PAGE_SIZE_MASK:
> > +                   ret = viommu_set_pgsize_bitmap(vdev, (void *)prop, len);
> > +                   break;
> >             default:
> >                     dev_err(dev, "unknown viommu prop 0x%x\n", type);
> >             }
> > @@ -630,7 +647,7 @@ static int viommu_domain_finalise(struct
> > viommu_endpoint *vdev,
> >
> >     vdomain->id             = (unsigned int)ret;
> >
> > -   domain->pgsize_bitmap   = viommu->pgsize_bitmap;
> > +   domain->pgsize_bitmap   = vdev->pgsize_bitmap;
> >     domain->geometry        = viommu->geometry;
> >
> >     vdomain->map_flags      = viommu->map_flags;
> > @@ -654,6 +671,29 @@ static void viommu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain
> *domain)
> >     kfree(vdomain);
> >  }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Check whether the endpoint's capabilities are compatible with
> > +other
> > + * endpoints in the domain. Report any inconsistency.
> > + */
> > +static bool viommu_endpoint_is_compatible(struct viommu_endpoint *vdev,
> > +                                     struct viommu_domain *vdomain) {
> > +   struct device *dev = vdev->dev;
> > +
> > +   if (vdomain->viommu != vdev->viommu) {
> > +           dev_err(dev, "cannot attach to foreign vIOMMU\n");
> > +           return false;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   if (vdomain->domain.pgsize_bitmap != vdev->pgsize_bitmap) {
> > +           dev_err(dev, "incompatible domain bitmap 0x%lx != 0x%llx\n",
> > +                   vdomain->domain.pgsize_bitmap, vdev->pgsize_bitmap);
> > +           return false;
> > +   }
> 
> I'm confused by this. So let's assume host supports pages sizes of 4k, 2M, 
> 1G. It
> signals this in the properties. Nice.
> Now domain supports 4k, 2M and that's all. Why is that a problem?
> Just don't use 1G ...
> 
> 
> > +
> > +   return true;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int viommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct
> > device *dev)  {
> >     int i;
> > @@ -670,9 +710,8 @@ static int viommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain
> *domain, struct device *dev)
> >              * owns it.
> >              */
> >             ret = viommu_domain_finalise(vdev, domain);
> > -   } else if (vdomain->viommu != vdev->viommu) {
> > -           dev_err(dev, "cannot attach to foreign vIOMMU\n");
> > -           ret = -EXDEV;
> > +   } else if (!viommu_endpoint_is_compatible(vdev, vdomain)) {
> > +           ret = -EINVAL;
> >     }
> >     mutex_unlock(&vdomain->mutex);
> >
> > @@ -886,6 +925,7 @@ static int viommu_add_device(struct device *dev)
> >
> >     vdev->dev = dev;
> >     vdev->viommu = viommu;
> > +   vdev->pgsize_bitmap = viommu->pgsize_bitmap;
> >     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vdev->resv_regions);
> >     dev_iommu_priv_set(dev, vdev);
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h
> > b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h
> > index 48e3c29223b5..2cced7accc99 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h
> 
> As any virtio UAPI change, you need to copy virtio TC at some point before 
> this is
> merged ...
> 
> > @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ struct virtio_iommu_req_unmap {
> >
> >  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_NONE          0
> >  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_RESV_MEM              1
> > +#define VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_PAGE_SIZE_MASK        2
> >
> >  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_MASK          0xfff
> >
> 
> Does host need to know that guest will ignore the page size mask?
> Maybe we need a feature bit.
> 
> > @@ -119,6 +120,12 @@ struct virtio_iommu_probe_property {
> >     __le16                                  length;
> >  };
> >
> > +struct virtio_iommu_probe_pgsize_mask {
> > +   struct virtio_iommu_probe_property      head;
> > +   __u8                                    reserved[4];
> > +   __le64                                  pgsize_bitmap;
> > +};
> > +
> 
> This is UAPI. Document the format of pgsize_bitmap please.

I do not see uapi documentation in "Documentation" folder of other data struct 
in this file, am I missing something?

Thanks
-Bharat

> 
> 
> >  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_RESV_MEM_T_RESERVED   0
> >  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_RESV_MEM_T_MSI                1
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to