On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 05:06:05PM +0100, Halil Pasic wrote: > Currently force_dma_unencrypted() is only used by the direct > implementation of the DMA API, and thus resides in dma-direct.h. But > there is nothing dma-direct specific about it: if one was -- for > whatever reason -- to implement custom DMA ops that have to in the > encrypted/protected scenarios dma-direct currently deals with, one would > need exactly this kind of information.
I really don't think it has business being anywhre else, and your completely bogus second patch just proves the point. _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
