You got the "n" on "down" in the subject, but still missing "of" ;)
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 12:47:40PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > Some users need to make sure their rounding function accepts and returns > 64bit long variables regardless of the architecture. Sadly > roundup/rounddown_pow_two() takes and returns unsigned longs. It turns > out ilog2() already handles 32/64bit calculations properly, and being > the building block to the round functions we can rework them as a > wrapper around it. Missing "of" in the function names here. s/a wrapper/wrappers/ IIUC the point of this is that roundup_pow_of_two() returned "unsigned long", which can be either 32 or 64 bits (worth pointing out, I think), and many callers need something that returns "unsigned long long" (always 64 bits). It's a nice simplification to remove the "__" variants. Just as a casual reader of this commit message, I'd like to know why we had both the roundup and the __roundup versions in the first place, and why we no longer need both. > -#define roundup_pow_of_two(n) \ > -( \ > - __builtin_constant_p(n) ? ( \ > - (n == 1) ? 1 : \ > - (1UL << (ilog2((n) - 1) + 1)) \ > - ) : \ > - __roundup_pow_of_two(n) \ > - ) > +#define roundup_pow_of_two(n) \ > +( \ > + (__builtin_constant_p(n) && ((n) == 1)) ? \ > + 1 : (1ULL << (ilog2((n) - 1) + 1)) \ > +) Should the resulting type of this expression always be a ULL, even when n==1, i.e., should it be this? 1ULL : (1ULL << (ilog2((n) - 1) + 1)) \ Or maybe there's no case where that makes a difference? Bjorn _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
