On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 00:44:54 -0800 Neo Jia <c...@nvidia.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:19:27AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > > This adds the support to determine the isolation type > > of a mediated device group by checking whether it has > > an iommu device. If an iommu device exists, an iommu > > domain will be allocated and then attached to the iommu > > device. Otherwise, keep the same behavior as it is. > > > > Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok....@intel.com> > > Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.t...@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Sanjay Kumar <sanjay.k.ku...@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l....@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu...@linux.intel.com> > > Reviewed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com> > > --- > > drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c > > b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c > > index ccc4165474aa..f1392c582a3c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c > > @@ -1368,13 +1368,40 @@ static void vfio_iommu_detach_group(struct > > vfio_domain *domain, > > iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group); > > } > > > > Hi Baolu, > > To allow IOMMU-awared mdev, I think you need to modify the > vfio_iommu_type1_pin_pages and vfio_iommu_type1_unpin_pages to remove the > iommu->external_domain check. > > Could you please include that in your patch? If not, I can send out a separate > patch to address that issue.
I figured it was intentional that an IOMMU backed mdev would not use the pin/unpin interface and therefore the exiting -EINVAL returns would be correct. Can you elaborate on the use case for still requiring the mdev pin/unpin interface for these devices? Thanks, Alex _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
