On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 8:12 AM Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 03:13:11PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Does the patch below make a difference for you? Assigning an > > address to the S/G list is the only functional difference I could > > spot. Drivers really should never look at the S/G list on an > > error return, but.. > > And that was obviously just the second half of the patch, so here > is the full one: > > diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c > index 5731daa09a32..a896f46d0c31 100644 > --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c > +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c > @@ -786,10 +786,13 @@ swiotlb_map_sg_attrs(struct device *dev, struct > scatterlist *sgl, int nelems, > int i; > > for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nelems, i) { > - sg->dma_address = swiotlb_map_page(dev, sg_page(sg), > sg->offset, > + dma_addr_t dma_addr; > + > + dma_addr = swiotlb_map_page(dev, sg_page(sg), sg->offset, > sg->length, dir, attrs); > - if (sg->dma_address == DIRECT_MAPPING_ERROR) > + if (dma_addr == DIRECT_MAPPING_ERROR) > goto out_error; > + sg->dma_address = dma_addr; > sg_dma_len(sg) = sg->length; > }
I know Robin has already replied with more detailed info, but just to close the loop as I'm finally home, applying this patch didn't seem to help with the IO hangs I'm seeing w/ HiKey960. thanks -john _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu