Hi, On 11/12/18 3:20 PM, Liu, Yi L wrote:
boun...@lists.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf Of Lu Baolu Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 2:40 PM Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] iommu/vtd: Cleanup dma_remapping.h headerCommit e61d98d8dad00 ("x64, x2apic/intr-remap: Intel vt-d, IOMMU code reorganization") moved dma_remapping.h from drivers/pci/ to current place. It is entirely VT-d specific, but uses a generic name. This merges dma_remapping.h with include/linux/intel-iommu.h and removes dma_remapping.h as the result. Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok....@intel.com> Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com> Cc: Sohil Mehta <sohil.me...@intel.com> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu...@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> ---Reviewed-by: Liu, Yi L <yi.l....@intel.com> Just out of curious, did you considered to modify the original file name to be an intel specific file name? What makes you believe merging the file content to intel-iommu.h is better?
I don't think we need multiple headers for VT-d specific things. Best regards, Lu Baolu _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
