On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 11:54:15AM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > of_dma_configure() was *supposed* to be following the same logic as > acpi_dma_configure() and only setting bus_dma_mask if some range was > specified by the firmware. However, it seems that subtlety got lost in > the process of fitting it into the differently-shaped control flow, and > as a result the force_dma==true case ends up always setting the bus mask > to the 32-bit default, which is not what anyone wants. > > Make sure we only touch it if the DT actually said so.
This looks good, but I think it could really use a comment as the use of ret all the way down the function isn't exactly obvious. Let me now if you want this picked up through the OF or DMA trees. _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
