On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 02:24:16PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Pasid table memory allocation could return failure due to memory
> shortage. Limit the pasid table size to 1MiB because current 8MiB
> contiguous physical memory allocation can be hard to come by. W/o
> a PASID table, the device could continue to work with only shared
> virtual memory impacted. So, let's go ahead with context mapping
> even the memory allocation for pasid table failed.
>
> Fixes: cc580e41260d ("iommu/vt-d: Per PCI device pasid table interfaces")
> Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok....@intel.com>
> Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Pelton Kyle D <kyle.d.pel...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
