On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 03:09:41PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> On 7/24/2018 2:06 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:23:56PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >>diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> >>index 7c69736a30f8..4cb53bf4f423 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> >>+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> >>@@ -2229,12 +2229,19 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct
> >>platform_device *pdev)
> >> if (err)
> >> return err;
> >>- if (smmu->version == ARM_SMMU_V2 &&
> >>- smmu->num_context_banks != smmu->num_context_irqs) {
> >>- dev_err(dev,
> >>- "found only %d context interrupt(s) but %d required\n",
> >>- smmu->num_context_irqs, smmu->num_context_banks);
> >>- return -ENODEV;
> >>+ if (smmu->version == ARM_SMMU_V2) {
> >>+ if (smmu->num_context_banks > smmu->num_context_irqs) {
> >>+ dev_err(dev,
> >>+ "found only %d context irq(s) but %d required\n",
> >>+ smmu->num_context_irqs, smmu->num_context_banks);
> >>+ return -ENODEV;
> >>+ } else if (smmu->num_context_banks < smmu->num_context_irqs) {
> >>+ /* loose extra context interrupts */
> >>+ dev_notice(dev,
> >>+ "found %d context irq(s) but only %d required\n",
> >>+ smmu->num_context_irqs, smmu->num_context_banks);
> >>+ smmu->num_context_irqs = smmu->num_context_banks;
> >>+ }
> >I don't see the utility in the new message. Can you simplify with the patch
> >below on top? It's a bit weird that we only decide to ignore the extra irqs
> >after calling platform_get_irq() on them, but that seems to be harmless.
>
> Thanks. I will modify as suggested below and respin.
It's ok, I can make the change locally.
Will
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
