On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:24:52PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > It's not entirely unreasonable for io-pgtable-arm to be built for > configurations with 32-bit phys_addr_t, where the compiler rightly > raises a warning about the 36-bit shift. That particular code path > should never actually *run* on those systems, but we still want it > to compile cleanly, which is easily done by using an unambiguous u64 > as the intermediate type instead. > > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.mur...@arm.com> > --- > > Oops, I managed to totally overlook that phys_addr_t would be > configuration-dependent, sorry :( > > If this can't sneak in on top of the SMMU pull, I'll resend it > as a fix for -rc1. It shouldn't be super-critical. > > drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied it, thanks Robin. _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
