On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 02:42:00PM +0000, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> But even with loop-limit we will need ratelimit each printk() *also*.
> Otherwise loop-limit will be based on time spent printing, not on
> anything else..
> The patch makes sense even with loop-limit in my opinion.
Looks like I mis-read your patch, somehow it looked to me as if you
replace all 'ratelimited' usages with a call to __ratelimit(), but you
just move 'ratelimited' into the loop, which actually makes sense.
But still, this alone is no proper fix for the soft-lockups you are
seeing.
Joerg
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
