On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:53:40 +0000 Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com> wrote:
> When enabling both VFIO and VIRTIO_IOMMU modules, automatically select > VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1 as well. > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com> > --- > drivers/vfio/Kconfig | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig > index c84333eb5eb5..65a1e691110c 100644 > --- a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig > @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ config VFIO_VIRQFD > menuconfig VFIO > tristate "VFIO Non-Privileged userspace driver framework" > depends on IOMMU_API > - select VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1 if (X86 || S390 || ARM_SMMU || ARM_SMMU_V3) > + select VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1 if (X86 || S390 || ARM_SMMU || ARM_SMMU_V3 || > VIRTIO_IOMMU) > select ANON_INODES > help > VFIO provides a framework for secure userspace device drivers. Why are we basing this on specific IOMMU drivers in the first place? Only ARM is doing that. Shouldn't IOMMU_API only be enabled for ARM targets that support it and therefore we can forget about the specific IOMMU drivers? Thanks, Alex _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
