On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:08:01 +0000
Liviu Dudau <liviu.du...@arm.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 03:01:44PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 14:25:14 +0000
> > Liviu Dudau <liviu.du...@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 04:48:45PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > > Hi Joerg,
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On 20/09/17 15:13, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > > > If the IPMMU driver is compiled in the kernel it will replace the
> > > > > platform bus IOMMU ops on running the ipmmu_init() function,
> > > > > regardless
> > > > > if there is any IPMMU hardware present or not. This screws up systems
> > > > > that just want to build a generic kernel that runs on multiple
> > > > > platforms
> > > > > and use a different IOMMU implementation.
> > > > >
> > > > > Move the bus_set_iommu() call at the end of the ipmmu_probe() function
> > > > > when we know that hardware is present. With current IOMMU framework it
> > > > > should be safe (at least for OF case).
> > > > >
> > > > > Now that the ipmmu_init() and ipmmu_exit() functions are simple calls
> > > > > to
> > > > > platform_driver_register() and platform_driver_unregister(), replace
> > > > > them with the module_platform_driver() macro call.
> > > >
> > > > Are you OK with taking this patch as a fix for 4.14, or would you rather
> > > > have something that can safely backport past 4.12 without implicit
> > > > dependencies? This is a config/link-order dependent thing that's been
> > > > lurking since the beginning, but only coming to light now that other
> > > > drivers are changing their behaviour, so I don't think there's really a
> > > > single Fixes: commit that can be singled out.
> > >
> > > Can someone update me on the fate of this patch? Can someone queue it
> > > for the next release?
> >
> > Sorry, this is another patch that wasn't on my radar while Joerg is out
> > on paternity leave. I didn't follow the replies to Laurent's question
> > about ordering and perhaps this plays in to Robin asking about fixes
> > for specific kernel versions. It seems there are some changes
> > elsewhere that somehow defer the ordering problem or don't matter on an
> > Arm Juno board (whatever that is). Can someone explain?
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> Thanks for replying!
>
> Laurent was positing that doing the bus_set_iommu() call in the probe
> function will break setups
Yes, I understood that. Replying that it was on an Arm64 Juno board
did not in any way clarify to me how that concern is addressed. Thanks,
Alex
> > If there's a
> > desire for a stable tag for this, it seems like we need to know
> > explicitly the range where it's safe to apply. Also, the patch needs
> > to be updated and re-evaluated in the presence of:
> >
> > cda52fcd999f iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Make use of IOMMU_OF_DECLARE()
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alex
> >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.du...@arm.com>
> > > > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+rene...@ideasonboard.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c | 29 +++++------------------------
> > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> > > > > index 195d6e93ac718..31912997bffdf 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> > > > > @@ -966,10 +966,11 @@ static int ipmmu_probe(struct platform_device
> > > > > *pdev)
> > > > > return ret;
> > > > >
> > > > > /*
> > > > > - * We can't create the ARM mapping here as it requires the bus
> > > > > to have
> > > > > - * an IOMMU, which only happens when bus_set_iommu() is called
> > > > > in
> > > > > - * ipmmu_init() after the probe function returns.
> > > > > + * Now that we have validated the presence of the hardware, set
> > > > > + * the bus IOMMU ops to enable future domain and device setup.
> > > > > */
> > > > > + if (!iommu_present(&platform_bus_type))
> > > > > + bus_set_iommu(&platform_bus_type, &ipmmu_ops);
> > > > >
> > > > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mmu);
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -1006,27 +1007,7 @@ static struct platform_driver ipmmu_driver = {
> > > > > .remove = ipmmu_remove,
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > -static int __init ipmmu_init(void)
> > > > > -{
> > > > > - int ret;
> > > > > -
> > > > > - ret = platform_driver_register(&ipmmu_driver);
> > > > > - if (ret < 0)
> > > > > - return ret;
> > > > > -
> > > > > - if (!iommu_present(&platform_bus_type))
> > > > > - bus_set_iommu(&platform_bus_type, &ipmmu_ops);
> > > > > -
> > > > > - return 0;
> > > > > -}
> > > > > -
> > > > > -static void __exit ipmmu_exit(void)
> > > > > -{
> > > > > - return platform_driver_unregister(&ipmmu_driver);
> > > > > -}
> > > > > -
> > > > > -subsys_initcall(ipmmu_init);
> > > > > -module_exit(ipmmu_exit);
> > > > > +module_platform_driver(ipmmu_driver);
> > > > >
> > > > > MODULE_DESCRIPTION("IOMMU API for Renesas VMSA-compatible IPMMU");
> > > > > MODULE_AUTHOR("Laurent Pinchart
> > > > > <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com>");
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
