On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 08:05:21PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 02:44:24PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > > Since Nate reported a reasonable performance boost from the out-of-line > > MSI polling in v1 [1], I've now implemented the equivalent for cons > > polling as well - that has been boot-tested on D05 with some trivial I/O > > and at least doesn't seem to lock up or explode. There's also a little > > cosmetic tweaking to make the patches a bit cleaner as a series. > > > > Robin. > > > > [1] > > https://www.mail-archive.com/iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org/msg19657.html > > > > Robin Murphy (5): > > iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Specialise CMD_SYNC handling > > iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Forget about cmdq-sync interrupt > > iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use CMD_SYNC completion interrupt > > iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Poll for CMD_SYNC outside cmdq lock > > iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use burst-polling for sync completion > > What's this final mythical patch about? I don't see it in the series. > > Anyway, the first two patches look fine to me, but this doesn't apply > on top of my iommu/devel branch so they will need rebasing.
No idea what I was doing wrong on Friday, but the first two patches apply cleanly now, so I'll push them out in a bit. Sorry for the noise, Will _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
