Hi Robin,

On 8/18/2017 1:33 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
Hi all,

Waiting for the command queue to drain for CMD_SYNC completion is likely
a contention hotspot on high-core-count systems. If the SMMU is coherent
and supports MSIs, though, we can use this cool feature (as suggested by
the architecture, no less) to make syncs effectively non-blocking for
anyone other than the caller.

I don't have any hardware that supports MSIs, but this has at least
passed muster on the Fast Model with cache modelling enabled - I'm hoping
the Qualcomm machines have the appropriate configuration to actually test
how well it works in reality. If it is worthwhile, I do have most of a
plan for how we can do something similar in the non-MSI polling case (it's
mostly a problem of handling the queue-wrapping edge cases correctly).

I tested this on QDF2400 hardware which supports MSI as a CMD_SYNC
completion signal. As with Thunder's "performance optimization" series,
I evaluated the patches using FIO with 4 NVME drives connected to a
single SMMU. Here's how they compared:

FIO - 512k blocksize / io-depth 32 / 1 thread per drive
 Baseline 4.13-rc1 w/SMMU enabled: 25% of SMMU bypass performance
 Baseline + Thunder Patch 1      : 28%
 Baseline + CMD_SYNC Optimization: 36%
 Baseline + Thunder Patches 2-5  : 86%
 Baseline + Thunder Patches 1-5  : 100% [!!]

Seems like it would probably be worthwhile to implement this for the
non-MSI case also. Let me know if there are other workloads you're
particularly interested in, and I'll try to get those tested too.

-Nate

Robin.


Robin Murphy (3):
   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Specialise CMD_SYNC handling
   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Forget about cmdq-sync interrupt
   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Utilise CMD_SYNC MSI feature

  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
  1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)


--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux 
Foundation Collaborative Project.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to