On 2017/3/24 10:27, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>
>
> On 2017/3/23 19:42, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 22/03/17 06:27, Zhen Lei wrote:
>>> Keep these four variables type consistent with the paramters of function
>>> __alloc_and_insert_iova_range and the members of struct iova:
>>>
>>> 1. static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,
>>> unsigned long size, unsigned long limit_pfn,
>>>
>>> 2. struct iova {
>>> unsigned long pfn_hi;
>>> unsigned long pfn_lo;
>>>
>>> In fact, limit_pfn is most likely larger than 32 bits on DMA64.
>>
>> FWIW if pad_size manages to overflow an int something's probably gone
>> horribly wrong, but there's no harm in making it consistent with
>> everything else here. However, given that patch #6 makes this irrelevant
>> anyway, do we really need to bother?
>
> Because I'm not sure whether patch #6 can be applied or not.
So if Patch #6 can be applied, I can merge this patch and patch #6 into one.
>
>>
>> Robin.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leiz...@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/iommu/iova.c | 6 +++---
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iova.c b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
>>> index b7268a1..8ba8b496 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/iova.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
>>> @@ -104,8 +104,8 @@ __cached_rbnode_delete_update(struct iova_domain
>>> *iovad, struct iova *free)
>>> * Computes the padding size required, to make the start address
>>> * naturally aligned on the power-of-two order of its size
>>> */
>>> -static unsigned int
>>> -iova_get_pad_size(unsigned int size, unsigned int limit_pfn)
>>> +static unsigned long
>>> +iova_get_pad_size(unsigned long size, unsigned long limit_pfn)
>>> {
>>> return (limit_pfn + 1 - size) & (__roundup_pow_of_two(size) - 1);
>>> }
>>> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct
>>> iova_domain *iovad,
>>> struct rb_node *prev, *curr = NULL;
>>> unsigned long flags;
>>> unsigned long saved_pfn;
>>> - unsigned int pad_size = 0;
>>> + unsigned long pad_size = 0;
>>>
>>> /* Walk the tree backwards */
>>> spin_lock_irqsave(&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags);
>>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>
--
Thanks!
BestRegards
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
