Hi Marek,
>Hi Sricharan,
>
>On 2016-08-09 00:49, Sricharan R wrote:
> > From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+rene...@ideasonboard.com>
> >
> > Failures to look up an IOMMU when parsing the DT iommus property need to
> > be handled separately from the .of_xlate() failures to support deferred
> > probing.
> >
> > The lack of a registered IOMMU can be caused by the lack of a driver for
> > the IOMMU, the IOMMU device probe not having been performed yet, having
> > been deferred, or having failed.
> >
> > The first case occurs when the device tree describes the bus master and
> > IOMMU topology correctly but no device driver exists for the IOMMU yet
> > or the device driver has not been compiled in. Return NULL, the caller
> > will configure the device without an IOMMU.
> >
> > The second and third cases are handled by deferring the probe of the bus
> > master device which will eventually get reprobed after the IOMMU.
> >
> > The last case is currently handled by deferring the probe of the bus
> > master device as well. A mechanism to either configure the bus master
> > device without an IOMMU or to fail the bus master device probe depending
> > on whether the IOMMU is optional or mandatory would be a good
> > enhancement.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
><laurent.pinchart+rene...@ideasonboard.com>
>
>It is a common practice to briefly describe here what has been changed
>since the original patch if you have modified it (see commit
>855ed04a3758b205e84b269f92d26ab36ed8e2f7 for the example).
>
Sorry i missed updating it. i will update the log.
> > Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricha...@codeaurora.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
> > drivers/of/device.c | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> > index 4c4219d..3994cf5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> > @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ const struct iommu_ops *of_iommu_configure(struct
>device *dev,
> > {
> > struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec;
> > struct device_node *np = NULL;
> > - struct iommu_ops *ops = NULL;
> > + const struct iommu_ops *ops = NULL;
> > int idx = 0;
> >
> > if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
> > @@ -189,8 +189,21 @@ const struct iommu_ops
>*of_iommu_configure(struct device *dev,
> > np = iommu_spec.np;
> > ops = of_iommu_get_ops(np);
> >
> > - if (!ops || !ops->of_xlate || ops->of_xlate(dev, &iommu_spec))
> > + if (!ops) {
> > + const struct of_device_id *oid;
> > +
> > + oid = of_match_node(&__iommu_of_table, np);
> > + ops = oid ? ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER) : NULL;
> > goto err_put_node;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!ops->of_xlate || ops->of_xlate(dev, &iommu_spec)) {
> > + ops = NULL;
> > + goto err_put_node;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (ops->add_device)
> > + ops = ops->add_device(dev) ? ops : NULL;
>
>ops->add_device() returns ZERO on success or error code on failure, so
>the above
>line should be changed to:
> ops = (ops->add_device(dev) == 0) ? ops : NULL;
Yes, i fixed it while testing, but somehow have missed it while sending it.
will fix it.
Regards,
Sricharan
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
