Hi Robin/Laurent, >> -----Original Message----- >> From: linux-arm-kernel [mailto:linux-arm-kernel- >> boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Marek Szyprowski >> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 6:23 PM >> To: Sricharan R <sricha...@codeaurora.org>; will.dea...@arm.com; >> robin.mur...@arm.com; j...@8bytes.org; iommu@lists.linux- >> foundation.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; >> laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com >> Subject: Re: [RFC 0/9] IOMMU probe deferral support >> >> Hello, >> >> >> On 2016-04-25 17:58, Sricharan R wrote: >> > This is mostly a repost of the probe deferral series from Laurent >> > Pinchart [1]. Added a check to fix boot with ACPI. >> > Adapted arm-smmu driver to work with deferred probing and added a new >> > api for the below reason. This is based on the generic iommu binding >> > series from Robin Murphy <robin.mur...@arm.com>. >> >> Thanks for this patchset. I'm working on some serious rework in exynos >> power domains and clocks support code and it turned out that I need this >> feature to resolve probing order. It works fine on my internal tree, where >> some iommu controllers cannot get their clocks early enough. >> >> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprow...@samsung.com> >> > Thanks for testing. So the issue that I was facing also was the same where > the iommu > controllers cannot get clocks early. So waiting for some suggestions if > this is right/ > or there is another way for doing this probe deferral?
So wanted to ask what will be approach to have the probe deferral working. I remember that you mentioned last time that you were going to visit this. Hence thought of asking how to proceed on this ? Regards, Sricharan _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
